David Wenham, Hugh Jackman, Kate Beckinsale, Richard Roxburgh, Shuler Hensley ...( see more  see more... ) , Will Kemp , Will Kempe

Set in the late 19th century, Bram Stoker's fabled monster hunter, Dr. Abraham Van Helsing, is summoned to a mysterious land in East Europe to vanquish evil forces in the form of: Count Dracula, the W...( read more  read more... )olf Man and Frankenstein's Monster. Assisting him once he gets there is Anna, the heir of a long-running family committed to hunting down and destroying Count Dracula.

Flixster Users

66% liked it

531,863 ratings

Critics

23% liked it

203 critics

PG-13, 2 hr. 25 min.

Directed by: Stephen Sommers

Release Date: May 7, 2004

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: October 19, 2004

Get It:

Stats: 28,382 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating
Facebook

Flixster Reviews (28,382)


  • January 7, 2010
    i love this movie. it is awsome. the way they made it black and white in the begging makes u think of those old movies with bela lagosi richard roxbrugh is one of the best draculas ive seen for a long time ...if u watch the bloopers hugh jackman has such a creepy laugh!
  • November 29, 2009
    Is Van Helsing a Comic character? If yes they changed his background everytime they made a new movie based on him.
  • July 18, 2009
    Such a cool idea, I love it, but they wrecked it. The start is great, in the village against the vamp brides and the black and white homage to Hammer at the very start was so good. The werewolves look amazing ( best since American Werewolf in London) but Dracula is sooo camp, Fra...( read more)nkenstein's monster is shit and eggs hatching into vamps?? what the hell! Beckinsale is white hot and Jackman is a good hero, but they just loose the whole film from the midway point, it gets so tacky, almost like a music video with Roxburgh as Dracula, and the whole Bond gadgets sideline is too much of a rip of.
  • July 12, 2009
    It's big, it's dumb, it's cheesy as hell, but I found it to be enormous fun. This was made to be a roller-coaster ride and by that token it should be judged.

    Actually after the opening pastiche of the Boris Karloff Frankenstein movie, I thought this had the potential to be a 5 s...( read more)tar movie. It was very atmospheric and had me hooked. However the film never really captures any sense of magic from there onwards.

    The main body of the movie does go on a bit, and it could have done with some attempt to create engaging characters. Plot and story are not always necessary for fun movies, but you do need characters with a level of interest to capture the mind, otherwise you tend to find yourself not giving a s**t. I felt Van Helsing did verge into this territory, but for the most part it's so fast paced this doesn't matter so much. The points where it does try to introduce plot are the moments where it really does fail. In fact there is too much going on that is never really explained, and I think it would've been better not to have bothered at all, than use the nonsense Sommers resorts too. For example the attempts at backstory to Van Helsing. Better to have one of those interlude chatty scenes you have in the Indy films, where it establishes he's a dude, rather than the poor attempts at angst and pathos. Really bad was the moment he gets upset over Frankie's Monster. What the hell was that all about?

    Hmm maybe I took that a bit seriously, but the movie knows what it is, why try be something else. I also thought that that masked ball sequence was a natural conclusion, the eventual finale at the castle felt like an add on, which lacked any real punch.

    Far better was Van's introduction to Transylvania, with the benefit of some neat angles and panning shots, the crossbow battle with the brides was cool. The coach chase was exciting without being exhilarating, but kept the flow going, so it's a shame some more bad plot gets thrown in, especially when it was involving the underwritten Velkan. That's the film's main problem - overkill of characters, with little space given to any of them to evolve.

    Finally a word on the CGI. I thought it was very good, especially the morphs that were used. The very first moment Drac starts to turn made me jump a touch, and when the vampires turns into their fanged, contorted state it looked pretty scary to me. The wolfman transformation, with the ripping flesh looked genuinely painful. At this point I was thinking the CGI was genuinely stunning. I'd have preferred the finale if it had just been Van vs Drac though, having CGI characters fight felt uninvolving, and Drac in snarly state was far better than the beast he turns into.

    This is a movie to genuinely switch of the brain and enjoy. At times there's too much going on and perhaps a bit too much swinging about for my liking, but it's an adrenaline filled ride
  • April 27, 2009
    "The One Name They All Fear"

    The notorious monster hunter is sent to Transylvania to stop Count Dracula who is using Dr. Frankenstein's research and a werewolf for some sinister purpose.

    REVIEW

    No d...( read more)oubt many a viewer will want to slow roast this piece of cinematic excess over a crackling fire, and perhaps maybe the director and cast as well. While Van Helsing may be no masterpiece, it is certainly a bit much to say this is the worst film ever made. Granted, there is more CGI here than there is actual cast, and it gets to be nauseating. The problem with CGI is that it just doesn't look real. You can tell that forbidding castle and those green-baby-bat-things and are fake. The only thing less genuine in this movie is Kate Beckinsale's atrocious Romanian accent, which simply grates on the ears. (I haven't been this offended since Dennis Quaid tried to do New Orleans in "The Big Easy.") Hugh Jackman's a poor actor, and this is rather poor material, so at least there's a match there.

    Nevertheless I have to give the devil his due. "Van Helsing" turns out to be good, campy, badly-acted fun. If our senses are overloaded with monsters, explosions, and relatively bloodless violence, at least we enjoy it. It's everything a campy movie should be: A fix of mindless testosterone injected straight into the cerebral cortex. If we've all turned into culture junkies then at least here's a good score.
  • February 3, 2010
    I loved this movie. I like to watch it more than once.
  • February 1, 2010
    Usually I don't like those films, but this one was pretty cool!
  • January 31, 2010
    Cool movie. Nice to see a movie from the vampire hunters point of view, considering all the new vampire movies.
  • January 28, 2010
    Lots of fluff but not enough story. It's like a fluffer nutter with out enough marshmallow. Much hype, no bite.
  • January 28, 2010
    Okay, this is getting boring. the vampire thingy. Why can't they come with something new? Anyway, this movie was okay. Nothing mind blowing.

Critic Reviews


August 1, 2004
Anthony Lane, The New Yorker

The horror flick, at its height, was a lyrical caressing of our fears; by the end of this nonsense, you fear for the well-being of the genre. 'It's dead!' full review

June 6, 2004
David Edelstein, Slate

It's empty calories: There isn't a single nourishing, non-synthetic sequence in the entire movie. Not a scene. Not a line. Not a look. full review

May 7, 2004
Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times

This movie is just too silly for words. full review

May 7, 2004
Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com

This is what happens when you spend pots of money on special effects but don't give a fig about storytelling. full review

May 7, 2004
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Silly and spectacular, and fun. full review

May 6, 2004
Edward Havens, FilmJerk.com

A gargantuan mess of a film, which substitutes special effects for story and has not a single redeeming moment in its two hour plus running time. full review

May 6, 2004
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

A shrieking bore. full review

May 6, 2004
A.O. Scott, The New York Times

Despite the rococo obsessiveness of its special effects and its voracious sampling of past horror movies, Van Helsing is mostly content to offer warmed-over allusions and secondhand thrills. full review

May 6, 2004
Colin Covert, The Minneapolis Star Tribune

More and more summer movies depend on relentless action sequences at the expense of coherent narrative, but Van Helsing might be the first whose overkill reaches nuclear capacity. full review

March 31, 2004
Nick Schager, Slant Magazine

Perhaps the loudest summer film of all time, Van Helsing's apt to provide more migraines than nightmares. full review

View more Van Helsing reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • leongwah
    August 29, 2009
    i love vamp movie !!! such good idea in this film
  • dorothyelizabeth6789
    June 15, 2008
    adooooore this film. richard roxburgh is by FAR my favorite Dracula.
  • karthu1993
    May 29, 2008
    Not boring but too violent to watch. and the ending ruined the movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
  • itbegins2005
    April 26, 2008
    HOW DO YOU FUCK UP THIS PREMISE?!? Young Van Helsing has to take on the Wolfman, the Frankenstein monster AND Dracula- sounds frickin' AWESOME to me! Except instead of Van Helsing, we get a 19th century James Bond wannabe who finds himself in an Indiana Jones rip-off that never even TRIES for horror, or even atmosphere (save in the first, glorious scene). Way to make a brightly lit monster movie, Stephen Sommers- you are dead to me now.
  • valentin702
    April 23, 2008
    Glorious movie!!!
    one of my favorites!!

    Besides... you have Kate Beckinsale AND Hugh Jackman!!!
  • mariefuller80
    April 7, 2008
    A boring wreck.
  • hippiesrkewl
    January 20, 2008
    very awesome movie i totally luved it!
  • carbadi09
    October 20, 2007
    Do not enjoy as much as I thought much publicity in the t.v. And everything but the movie was bad in the end. The effects were almost like some video games and other bad effects where they noticed the assembly lines, the effects of tear franknstein is outdated. Poor saw only once and I do not want to see it fall again.
  • MorpheusOne
    September 22, 2007
    A subpar action/horror film. The subplot of Van Helsing's & Dracula's deep/long lost connection made me wonder if I wasted my time... I probably did! If you catch it on cable it might be worth it, but if you see it in the theater, unless you sneak in and see it completely for free, it isn't worth it!
  • jaybird95
    August 17, 2007
    This is my fav movie :D

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
    Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (55%)
  • The Brothers Grimm
    The Brothers Grimm (63%)
  • The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
    The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (81%)
  • A Life Less Ordinary
    A Life Less Ordinary (57%)

Facts


  • Tagline:
    great movie..

Van Helsing : Watch Free on TV


Van Helsing Trivia


  • Who starred in Van Helsing, X-Men, and Swordfish?  Answer »
  • Which of the following legends is not in the movie "VAN HELSING"?  Answer »
  • Hugh Jackman, Sir Anthony Hopkins and Mel Brooks have all played which character?  Answer »
  • Who is the actor who has a role in all of these movies? -The Prestige -Van Helsing -X-men -Kate and Leopold  Answer »

Most Popular Skin